[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13059299#comment-13059299
 ] 

Rupert Westenthaler commented on STANBOL-246:
---------------------------------------------

In revision 1142520 I implemented functionality that ensures that exact matches 
are always ranked on top of suggestions that do not exactly match the searched 
name. 
We might want to have this feature configurable.

> Exact name match should get boosted in the entity hub SolrYard indices
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STANBOL-246
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-246
>             Project: Stanbol
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Olivier Grisel
>            Assignee: Rupert Westenthaler
>         Attachments: united_states_dbpedia_solrindex.json
>
>
> For instance, using the default embedded solryard index:
> {code}
>  curl -X POST -d "name=United States&limit=10&offset=0" 
> http://localhost:8080/entityhub/site/dbpedia/find
> {code}
> The first results are "United States Navy" and "United States Air Force" and 
> finally "United States" comes in the third position. See the attached JSON 
> output.
> Exact name match (or close to exact matches) should get a score boost. This 
> can probably be implemented with FuzzyQuery and minSimilarity of 0.8f for 
> instance.
> https://lucene.apache.org/java/3_3_0/api/all/org/apache/lucene/search/FuzzyQuery.html
> Maybe in this case the popularity boost are bad because of the naive incoming 
> links. Using a Page Rank style centrality score might work better in this 
> case:
> https://github.com/julienledem/Pig-scripting-examples/tree/master/Page%20Rank
> https://github.com/mesos/spark/blob/master/bagel/src/main/scala/spark/bagel/examples/WikipediaPageRank.scala

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to