[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13182519#comment-13182519
 ] 

Ali Anil Sinaci commented on STANBOL-446:
-----------------------------------------

Parent POM of Contenthub provides a Bundle-Category for the bundles under 
Contenthub. This is also the case for Entityhub and Enhancer. I guess 
Bundle-Category is the category information for each bundle that we can see 
from the Felix console. I prefer to keep it for this reason.

On the other hand, I can move the dependencies to Stanbol's parent (so, parent 
pom for contenthub will exist, but it will have no dependencies), however I 
need to try whether it will lead to conflicts or not. For example, we need 
jersey-client with a "provided" scope, but in Stanbol's parent its scope is 
"test". I will try to change it to "provided" and be sure there will be no 
conflict and apply the changes in my next patch.
                
> Remove ContentHub parent POM
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: STANBOL-446
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-446
>             Project: Stanbol
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Fabian Christ
>            Assignee: Suat Gonul
>              Labels: Dependencies
>
> The ContentHub has its own parent POM which inherits from the global parent 
> POM. It is unclear why the ContentHub needs its own parent POM. Versions of 
> artifacts should be defined in the global parent POM.
> Therefore, the ContentHub parent POM should be removed as it is not needed.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to