On 24 March 2011 10:51, Olivier Grisel <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2011/3/24 Fabian Christ <[email protected]>:
>> Thinking about this,
>>
>> what about an new bundle
>>
>> org.apache.stanbol.welcome
>> or
>> org.apache.stanbol.doc
>>
>> this bundle would include
>>
>> * A welcome and intro page to Stanbol
>> * Links to API docs that are generated and automatically included in this 
>> bundle
>> * same for REST API docs
>> * Further documentation
>> * (Interactive) demos/tutorials that show how to use Stanbol
>>
>> To start this bundle would use the existing pages from the
>> enhancer/jersey bundle.
>>
>> And as I'm working on something similar for the IKS project I would
>> like to work on this in Stanbol. People who create new features for
>> Stanbol can easily provide demos this way.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Best,
>>  - Fabian
>>
>> 2011/3/24 Fabian Christ <[email protected]>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> currently you have to use the Stanbol Enhancer Jersey bundle to get
>>> the enhancement functionality. This bundle registers the root resource
>>> on "/" and presents a nice intro page when going to localhost:8080.
>>>
>>> When you are in a scenario where you want to include Stanbol in
>>> another technology stack, e.g. the IKS, you don't want this behaviour
>>> as you would like to control what happens on root "/".
>>>
>>> I think it's nice that Stanbol provides this starting screen but what
>>> about to map it localhost:8080/stanbol or something similar? Or should
>>> we split this and create an own welcome screen bundle. Then an
>>> integrator can decide whether to load this bundle or not. Perhaps this
>>> could be refactored into an online documentation/demo bundle?
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>
> I would rather extract the generic part (the OSGi component, the
> RootResource, ...) of stanbol/enhancer/jersey into a toplevel
> stanbol/web or stanbol/jersey and have the stanbol/enhancer/jersey
> keep the JAX-RS resources related to enhancement of content items that
> would incrementally contribute to the OSGi HTTP endpoint, contributing
> both the implementation of the JAX-resource and the API documentation
> of the resource.
Why don't separate the stanbol rest commons and the welcome/demo staff?
>
> --
> Olivier
> http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel
>



-- 
Enrico Daga

--
http://www.enridaga.net
skype: enri-pan

Reply via email to