Thanks for your inputs !
So I will use this kind of schema :
> urn:123 rdf:type TextAnnotation
> urn:123 selected-text "+43 655 290989"
> urn:123 start "123"^^xsd:int
> urn:123 end "137"^^xsd:int
> urn:123 dc:related urn:456
>
> urn:456 rdf:type http://schema.org/ContactPoint
> urn:456 http://schema.org/telephone "+43655290989"
I have a question about the "direction" of the dc:related and the
expression of
"> urn:456 "is a suggested semantic interpretation of the 'stuff'
> referenced by the text annotation" urn:123."
Couldn't be better to have this ?
> urn:123 rdf:type TextAnnotation
> urn:123 selected-text "+43 655 290989"
> urn:123 start "123"^^xsd:int
> urn:123 end "137"^^xsd:int
>
> urn:456 rdf:type http://schema.org/ContactPoint
> urn:456 http://schema.org/telephone "+43655290989"
> urn:456 dc:related urn:123
AFAIK this is the "direction" used in EntityAnnotation.
Another point, just to be sure, you mean dc:relation and not dc:related
right ?
Will go to play a little bit to get that ! :)
Thanks.
On 07/19/2011 11:14 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
2011/7/18 Rupert Westenthaler<[email protected]>:
Hi Florent
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:09 PM, florent andré
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi !
I worked on the UIMA engine to make it more generic.
It's now easy to add uima annotator, and I try the RegexAnnotator [1].
Depending on the configured regex, this annotator can output email, isbn,...
AFAIK there is for now just TextAnnotation and EntityAnnotation type, and I
don't know if they are suitable for things like email, telephone number,...
I see several possibilities:
1) use a TextAnnotation with a custom value for dc:type
urn:123 rdf:type TextAnnotation
urn:123 dc:type<http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#Cell>
urn:123 selected-text "+43 655 290989"
urn:123 start "123"^^xsd:int
urn:123 end "137"^^xsd:int
I used here the concepts defined for CellPhones by the vCard ontology
2) use a TextAnnotation with an additional type
urn:123 rdf:type TextAnnotation
urn:123 rdf:type http://schema.org/ContactPoint
urn:123 selected-text "+43 655 290989"
urn:123 start "123"^^xsd:int
urn:123 end "137"^^xsd:int
urn:123 http://schema.org/telephone "+43655290989"
Here I used the ContactPoint as defined by schema.org
As I am writing this I have a preference for variant (2). Any other
opinions, suggestions?
urn:123 should not have both types at the same time: it's not true
that the annotation is the ContactPoint.
I would rather use:
urn:123 rdf:type TextAnnotation
urn:123 selected-text "+43 655 290989"
urn:123 start "123"^^xsd:int
urn:123 end "137"^^xsd:int
urn:123 dc:related urn:456
urn:456 rdf:type http://schema.org/ContactPoint
urn:456 http://schema.org/telephone "+43655290989"
In the future, we should define a dedicated property to replace
dc:related so as to express:
urn:456 "is a suggested semantic interpretation of the 'stuff'
referenced by the text annotation" urn:123.
There might be several possible interpretation with confidence various
confidence score in case of ambiguity.
