Thanks Alessandro > > Is this an appropriate point in time for us to upgrade to > the latest > > SVN release in terms of any work-in-progress on revisions to the > > OntoNet API? > > Yes I think it's time to take the step.
Great, thanks. > > > Also, do you have any guidance on STANBOL-426, about resolving > > identifiers between ontologies in Ontonet with identifiers from > > external systems? We'll of course look at this in the > context of the > > revisions to the codebase, but any pointers you can provide will be > > gratefully received. > > I did not have time to comment on that one too, but the > OntologyProvider > interface does provide a low-level implementation of this issue (i.e. > getKey(IRI) where IRI can be either the logical or physical > IRI of the > ontology, and the Strings returned by the Clerezza provider > can be made > into UriRef) > > We just have to check if it's worth escalating it to the level of > scope/space/session. This sounds useful; we'll take a look as we integrate the latest SVN revision to see how well this fits our use case and get back to you. > > > I've also just raised a JIRA over the scalability issue we > had which > > you're aware of, please let us know if the latest revisions also > > tackle this issue. > > Great! It would be even better if you could provide more quantitative > details such as the exact size of the ontology and the VM heap space. I've added a comment to STANBOL-433 with some more information. > > Hopefully the Clerezza re-implementation helps out on this. There is > still a conversion bottleneck if you need to access an > ontology in OWL > API form, but I am bugging the Manchester guys for a possible > solution > (a midlevel Clerezza adapter). Great, we'll let you know how we get on. > > I am also considering making scopes and spaces able to export > Clerezza > Graphs as an alternative to OWLOntology objects, would that be of any > use to you? We'll come back to you as we progress with our implementatino. > -----Original Message----- > From: Alessandro Adamou [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 16 December 2011 18:47 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: For Acuity: thanks for your JIRA Tickets on the > Ontology Manager > > > Hi Steve, > > > Thanks very much for the update on this, we are looking forward to > > trying out the latest codebase; we'll raise any questions > we have over > > changes and deprecations on the list. > > That's perfect! The list and JIRA are the places. > > > Is this an appropriate point in time for us to upgrade to > the latest > > SVN release in terms of any work-in-progress on revisions to the > > OntoNet API? > > Yes I think it's time to take the step. > > > Also, do you have any guidance on STANBOL-426, about resolving > > identifiers between ontologies in Ontonet with identifiers from > > external systems? We'll of course look at this in the > context of the > > revisions to the codebase, but any pointers you can provide will be > > gratefully received. > > I did not have time to comment on that one too, but the > OntologyProvider > interface does provide a low-level implementation of this issue (i.e. > getKey(IRI) where IRI can be either the logical or physical > IRI of the > ontology, and the Strings returned by the Clerezza provider > can be made > into UriRef) > > We just have to check if it's worth escalating it to the level of > scope/space/session. > > > I've also just raised a JIRA over the scalability issue we > had which > > you're aware of, please let us know if the latest revisions also > > tackle this issue. > > Great! It would be even better if you could provide more quantitative > details such as the exact size of the ontology and the VM heap space. > > Hopefully the Clerezza re-implementation helps out on this. There is > still a conversion bottleneck if you need to access an > ontology in OWL > API form, but I am bugging the Manchester guys for a possible > solution > (a midlevel Clerezza adapter). > > I am also considering making scopes and spaces able to export > Clerezza > Graphs as an alternative to OWLOntology objects, would that be of any > use to you? > > Alessandro > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Alessandro Adamou [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 10:22 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: For Acuity: thanks for your JIRA Tickets on the Ontology > >> Manager > >> > >> Dear Martin, Steve, > >> > >> Thanks very much for the issues just opened on Stanbol JIRA > >> concerning ontology management. > >> > >> Most if not all of them were addressed in recent ontonet > revisions, > >> and I am documenting the changes with comments straight on > the issue > >> pages. Please feel free to follow up on them in case there are > >> additional requirements or misalignments with the current state. I > >> have roughly a couple of weeks to address any other issues > coming up. > >> > >> As it turns out, some parts of the ontonet API were > deprecated, but > >> others could just not stay there and had to be removed > altogether. I > >> apologise if this gets to break any of your previous code, > and will > >> be glad to point you to their replacements in return. > >> > >> Thank you again for the great cooperation. > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> Alessandro > >> > >> -- > >> M.Sc. Alessandro Adamou > >> > >> Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna > >> Department of Computer Science > >> Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40127 Bologna - Italy > >> > >> Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab) > >> Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology (ISTC) National > >> Research Council (CNR) Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome - Italy > >> > >> > >> "As for the charges against me, I am unconcerned. I am > beyond their > >> timid, lying morality, and so I am beyond caring." (Col. Walter E. > >> Kurtz) > > > > > > > -- > M.Sc. Alessandro Adamou > > Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna > Department of Computer Science > Mura Anteo Zamboni 7, 40127 Bologna - Italy > > Semantic Technology Laboratory (STLab) > Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology (ISTC) > National Research Council (CNR) > Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome - Italy > > > "As for the charges against me, I am unconcerned. I am beyond > their timid, lying morality, and so I am beyond caring." > (Col. Walter E. Kurtz) > >
