Hi Rupert, all I'm working on it, but i'm proceeding slowly because i cannot reproduce the error.
i'm sorry Alberto Il giorno 02/mar/2012, alle ore 00:20, Rupert Westenthaler ha scritto: > Hi Alberto > > I spent some time to look into "Build failed in Jenkins: stanbol-trunk-1.6 > #772" > > The most interesting file is the error.log file of the Stanbol > instance used for the integration test. > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/stanbol-trunk-1.6/ws/trunk/integration-tests/target/launchdir/sling/logs/error.log > > For the first view calls to the enhancer everything looks fine (~5sec > for the Refactor engine). > > But later - after time code "01.03.2012 19:49:21.04" (use this to > search in the file) something starts to went wrong with Jena TDB. > > [Thread-36] >> seo_refactoring and > [Thread-12] >> looks like a Jena TDB demon > > are the only active one (looks a little like a deadlock). > > You can safely ignore the [DataFileTrackingDaemon] this checks only > every 5sec for Resources of the DataFIleProvider. > > I have really no idea what is going on here. Maybe you can make more > sense of this > > best > Rupert > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Alberto Musetti <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Rupert, all >> >> Il giorno 29/feb/2012, alle ore 19:14, Rupert Westenthaler ha scritto: >> >>> Hi Alberto >>> >>> >>> On 29.02.2012, at 18:48, Alberto Musetti wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I would like to add the refactor engine in enhancer/bundlelist. >>>> It will be activated in the launcher full and full-war, >>>> but not in stable because there isn't rules and ontonet. >>>> >>>> May I add the refactor engine? >>>> >>> I think the full launcher should include all engines that are managed by >>> the Stanbol Community. So in principle a +1 from my side. >>> >>> Can I ask two questions: >>> >>> (1) What would that mean for the memory footprint. I usually run Stanbol >>> with -Xmx512m. Would that still work with the refactor engine? >> >> Yes, it would still work. >> Concerning performance and memory usage we are adding full support to >> Clerezza >> in the Refactor with spending effort and memory in graph tansformations. >> >>> >>> (2) Would the engine be active by default? Do you plan to ship the full >>> launcher with a default configuration or would a user need to manually >>> configure an instance? >>> >> >> There is a default configuration running at bundle start-up, >> i.e., the refactoring for the SEO demo. >> >> Best, >> Alberto >> >>> best >>> Rupert >>> >> > > > > -- > | Rupert Westenthaler [email protected] > | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 > | A-5500 Bischofshofen
