Le 10 avril 2012 16:37, Suat Gonul <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi, > > On 04/10/2012 05:27 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote: >> Le 10 avril 2012 13:59, Fabian Christ <[email protected]> a écrit >> : >>> Dear Stanbolers, >>> >>> I woud like to remind you that we have an open vote for the RC6 here. >>> Please, review the release so that we can proceed and get a release >>> ready to be voted for on the incubator mailing list. >>> >>> I still do not know if it will be problem that we have included the >>> OWL-API JAR in the source release. If this is a blocker, we have to >>> provide a -deps package along with the source release that contains >>> the OWL-API JAR. IMO we should not wait for the OWL-API people to >>> publish their work on central as this would cost additional time. >> I am ok to include the owl-api jar in the source release (while >> waiting for upstream to push it on maven central) as other apache >> projects seem to do so too. >> >> However there is also this jar: >> >> ./contenthub/search/related/src/main/resources/local-maven-repository/edu/smu/tspell/jaws/1.2/jaws-1.2.jar >> >> which AFAIK does not have any licensing info: >> >> http://lyle.smu.edu/~tspell/jaws/index.html >> >> By doing a quick grep on the edu.smu.tspell.jaws package in the >> contenthub/related subproject, it does not seem to be used anywhere. >> Shall we get rid of this dependency? >> >> Suat can you explain what this is needed for? >> > > It is used to obtain related keywords from Wordnet for the original > query term in featured search of Contenthub. But, its license issue has > been solved in STANBOL-445 and in STANBOL-550 Bertrand commented that it > was an Apache like one.
Ok sorry I missed that. +1 for the release then. -- Olivier http://twitter.com/ogrisel - http://github.com/ogrisel
