thanks for 1) for the 2) point i was not very clear sorry. I have on my test a particular weird use case where i am trying to provide results for almost two different cases on the same rdfs:label field, (where i have to use different tokenization approach, if that work) So my idea is to try to create a parallel field with a different tokenization approac and then copy it on the _text field. This is most common on solr, but i am at the beginning with stanbol, so i have some doubt: for example i'm not sure if the _text field is the field always used for the matches or not. I hope i was more clear this time, but i'm probably trying to do something which is strange, i know :-)
2012/5/10 Rupert Westenthaler <[email protected]> > Hi > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:00 PM, seralf <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi i'm trying to use the keyword linking engine with a customized solr > > configuration. Basically i need to understand two different things: > > > > 1. what are the default fields indexed and then used in the retrieval > > process? i look at the DEREFERENCE_FIELDS in the source, and i'm not > sure > > if this is or not the place to look at. > > Currently it is hard coded in the "DEREFERENCE_FIELDS" constant > defining fields required by the Web UI of the enhancer. Currently it > includes: > > * rdfs:comment > * geo:lat/geo:long > * foaf:depiction > * dbp-ont:thumbnail > > However note that in addition to this also the > > * nameField (the field configured to be used as label for extraction - > default: rdfs:label) > * redirectField (the field used to follow redirections - default: > rdf:seeAlso) > * typeField (the field used to determine the type of Entities - > default: rdf:type) > > are included. > > If you want this to be configurable I can easily add this feature. Not > sure why I have not enabled that in the beginning. > > > 2. starting from the fact that if i am sure about the field that is > used > > as a base to have a textual enhancement i could simple copy in that the > > results from other fields in the config, i wonder if i could define new > > fields and then consuming them into the process > > > > Sorry, I do not understand what you mean with that. > > > thanks in advance if someone could give me some suggestion > > > > Alfredo Serafini > > best > Rupert > > > > -- > | Rupert Westenthaler [email protected] > | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 > | A-5500 Bischofshofen >
