2012/5/30 Rupert Westenthaler <[email protected]>: > To conclude: I do not object with you suggestion. I only tried to > point out that I believe you assumption that the parent POM will not > change very often is not the case for a "dependency heavy" project > like Apache Stanbol. If you do not have a problem with parent POM > versions >20 than your proposal might still be OK. Otherwise I would > suggest to use minor version upgrades for version changes of > dependencies.
Yes, you might be right. IMO there is no problem with having version number >20 or even >100. It is just a counter to distinguish them. Best, - Fabian -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt
