Stephen Pendleton wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 11:34 AM To: XMPP Extension Discussion List Subject: Re: [Standards] geoloc: PEP=user, <iq>=resourceI can't speak for Ian, but "non-pubsub" seems right (where PEP is a flavor of pubsub and therefore included -- if you're an end user and you have a PEP service available at your "home" server, use that; if not, use a non-PEP pubsub service available on the 'net).Peter ---------------------------- OK, thats more clear. I also agree that we should remove non-pubsub methods.
We seem to have consensus on removing the non-pubsub examples.
For completeness sake it would be nice to include a pubsub example alongside the PEP example.
Really the only difference is the lack of a 'to' address on the publish request in PEP. I've added a note about that.
Updated version here: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0080-1.4.html Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre XMPP Standards Foundation http://www.xmpp.org/xsf/people/stpeter.shtml
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
