Daniel Noll wrote: > On Friday 06 July 2007 01:53, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> We *could* do that with the video phone activity. It's a bit of a >> borderline case, but IMHO it's going to be common enough that we want to >> define a separate activity for it. > > Video phones may become common enough one day (when Cisco stop thinking the > privilege is worth paying four times the price of a normal phone, there will > probably be a boom in them) but if you want other types of phone that are > already common enough to split into their own sections, I'm sure there are > plenty. Talking on a mobile vs. talking on a landline, for instance? > Talking on a VOIP softphone vs. using a "real" phone?
Feel free to define extensions for that in your own namespace. >>> 2. We already have presence for the other user to determine if I'm >>> contactable. i.e. can I not just set DND while on a video call? >> XEP-0108 is for things that are much more granular than <show>dnd</show>. > > That's why I will suggest doing both. Set activity to "on the phone" and > status to "dnd". That's more specific than doing either independently, and > doesn't even require inventing a new type of phone which may not even add any > useful information to the other user. What you do with presence is out of scope for XEP-0108. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre XMPP Standards Foundation http://www.xmpp.org/xsf/people/stpeter.shtml
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
