Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Unnikrishnan V wrote: >> I am not sure of any other services than used for voip ( stun, >> stun-relay etc ). > > Not yet. ;-) > >> As in my eyes XEP-215 is doing only _stun._udp srv query ( may be its my >> eye problem ). >> >> Now for adding turn we have to modify XEp-215.What if somebody want >> to use rsip instead of stun and stun-relay ? for the same reasons we >> started XEP-215 we have to make another XEP or upgrade. Even for >> _stun.tcp , _stun.tls queries, i am sure XEP 215 will be modified. > > You make a good point. > >> The best approach, in my opinion is to have a generic network service >> record framework and XMPP registrar to keep addition of services >> entries. The same framework can be used for network server offered >> service or XMPP service (like muc ). > > Yes I think that is worth considering. I'll give it some more thought > over the new few days...
Well, I thought about it some more. Please note something in XEP-0215: "This method should be used only as a fallback when DNS SRV lookups are not possible for the client or server." Now, I wonder why we're going to spend a lot of time defining something that is essentially DNS-SRV over XMPP. Why not encourage people to deploy SRV instead? Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
