Richard Dobson wrote: > jingle bytestream > ----- > When we come to implement file transfer using jingle I would suggest > that rather than creating a brand new backwards incompatible file > transfer protocol that we simply implement a new jingle bytestream > transport just like XEP-0047 and XEP-0065 which would allow complete > compatibility with the SI negotiation but still gets all the benefits a > file transfer over jingle UDP would bring, i.e. better likelihood of > connection.
I started working on such a beast a while back but never finished: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-bytestreams.html That covered XEP-0065 only, but naturally we could define a transport type for IBB (XEP-0047) too. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
