Dnia 07-11-2007, Śr o godzinie 19:42 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre pisze: > [NOTE: XEP-0020 is wrong when it shows an IQ-get in Example 1, that > should be an IQ-set -- I think this is a simple typo. For instance > that's what we have in XEP-0095 and XEP-0096.]
We talked about it on jdev, and noticed that XEP-0020 was heavily hacked lately. And it still shows some rough edges. ;-) > I don't think 2.2 contradicts 2.1. Perhaps it would help for me to add > some flow diagrams and also show the example at the end of section 2.2? Couldn't hurt. :-) -- /\_./o__ Tomasz Sterna (/^/(_^^' Xiaoka.com ._.(_.)_ XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
