Joe Hildebrand wrote:
> 
> On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Rachel Blackman wrote:
> 
>> Now you are supposed to just do a straight out disco query against the
>> user;http://foo.com/bar#somestring is not guaranteed to actually be a
>> valid query you can perform, which means old-style clients that expect
>> to do node#ver queries may not receive data at all.  Thus, we broke
>> backwards compatibility entirely.
> 
> 
> This is one of the (several) reasons why I *still* think that the
> request should still have http://foo.com/bar#somestring as the node.

Well, if we agree that a disco#info request to an unknown node should
result in an <item-not-found/> error then I would definitely agree.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to