Tomasz Sterna wrote: > On Cz, 2007-12-20 at 07:58 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Maybe this is something we can recommend >> in XEP-0205 (Best Practices to Discourage Denial of Service Attacks) >> but >> I don't think it belongs in the RFC. > > And what if that protective action directly violates RFC? > Ie. RFC says server MUST deliver the stanza...
Which is better? (1) Allow a denial of service attack. (2) Strictly adhere to the letter but not the spirit of the RFC. We can add helpful caveats to the RFC, but that makes it harder to read and understand. /psa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
