Dnia 2008-02-07, Cz o godzinie 14:45 +0100, Ralph Meijer pisze: > If your particular use case desires that you can subscribe to the > presence of two different things (and not two facets of the same > thing), > why not make two different bare JIDs for them? Why not have > [EMAIL PROTECTED], or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a valid argument and I see your point. And in a post [EMAIL PROTECTED] I expressed a reasoning with the similar conclusion. I agree that presence should be based on bare JIDs. I still see a very good use case for having full JIDs on the roster: to communicate with different facets of the same thing. Ex. chrome.pl/echo and chrome.pl/broadcast or [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gateway1 and [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gateway2 -- /\_./o__ Tomasz Sterna (/^/(_^^' http://www.xiaoka.com/ ._.(_.)_ im:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
