Lauri Kaila wrote: > 2008/4/10, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Offlist, someone mentioned to me that it might be appropriate for >> XEP-0167 to recommend or even require support for the ITU-T's G.711 >> technology, which is represented by payload-types 0 (PCMU) and 8 (PCMA) >> as registered with the IANA. >> http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.711/e >> >> Thoughts? >> > > I think 64 kbits/s is too much to be mandatory.
I think the idea was that G.711 is supported everywhere, so recommending support for it in Jingle would help interoperability with existing SIP networks and the PSTN. > But if that was recommended, would it be recommended to use with > silence suppression or comfort noice (RFC3389)? Probably, yes. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
