Pavel Simerda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And for announcing support for BoB in one Discovery Feature. > > This means you would just add back the Disco section :). > > Other suggestions from anyone?
I agree that this is easier as the client doesn't need to keep track of if the data has been requested from the remote client (or did I get it wrong? I understood it that way that a client should include a cid and shouldn't do that anymore if that cid isn't requested by the other client). So having it in disco / caps would make it easier. -- Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
