As Justin, Dave and others, I was always for this method... even before it became official XEP.
Pavel On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 15:37:00 +0200 Jonathan Schleifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am 05.10.2008 um 15:31 schrieb Pavel Simerda: > > > Then it doesn't work at all. It's not useful at all to achieve > > reliable > > services. > > > > Even xep-198 helps much better but doesn't work alone and is not > > required anyway. > > I haven't said it helps reliability, but the sender is warned that > the message has not arrived and can resend it. > > This is awfully useful, as you often don't know what the last > message was that someone received. > > And for me, it's enough if Gajim supports it, as that is already > more than 50% of my roster, I guess :). We need to encourage more > client developers to implement it. Gajim already gives a good example > of how you could display messages that did not arrive to the user > (AFAIK, it's the only client showing that to the user so far). > > -- > Jonathan > -- Pavel Šimerda Freelancer v oblasti počítačových sítí, komunikace a bezpečnosti Web: http://www.pavlix.net/ Jabber & Mail: pavlix(at)pavlix.net OpenID: pavlix.net
