Pavel Simerda wrote: > On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:28:36 -0600 > Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Brett Zamir wrote: >>> I had been wondering whether multiple FORM_TYPEs in Data Forms be >>> added to allow for multiple /standard/ specs being represented at >>> the same time... >>> >>> I have no particular need for this now, but I was curious about it >>> for the sake of future extensibility... >>> >>> Jack, in the developer chat room today mentioned Pubsub Queueing at >>> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/pubsub-queueing.html (in example >>> 1) as having such a need, but I thought I'd bring it up again here >>> to bring it up formally... >> Thinking ahead, eh? >> >> Scoping the same data form with two different FORM_TYPEs would be like >> qualifying the same XML element with different namespaces. No go. Or >> at least that's how XEP-0004 and XEP-0068 were designed. >> >> But you could include two different forms... >> >> Peter >> > > Can I extend this question? > > Shouldn't we use some sort of more proper namespacing of form fields > (or multiple forms) instead of practice that like node config in PubSub, > etc?
Yes, we could do that within the current XEP-0004 framework if we want to (basically say XEP-0068 was stupid and here's a better approach). Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
