Kurt Zeilenga wrote: > If there are some hidden assumptions/use cases, I think they should be > more clearly called out and discussed in the proposal.
I will do that in the next version > Some XMPP server implementations already support multiple passwords > per user. Of course, the server has no clue how such passwords are > shared amongst a user's clients, likewise for user certificates. They do? What XEP handles that? > I think what your proposal needs to focus on activation/deactivation > of user certificates, leaving revocation handling to other documents > (but noting that leave revocation handling to other documents). Thanks for the input. I see now that I need to write much more doc about the use case behind this. And I will not use revoke. Dirk -- Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time. I think I've forgotten this before.
