On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net> wrote: > This did get me wondering about the issue that if there's two semantically > identical forms for the same information, then should we ever wish to have > clients sign the privacy list, we have a C14N problem.
Well, semantical equivalence should be checked at the XML level, not at the XMPP level. Wouldn't you otherwise have problems with plain messages as well, since <message><body>a</body><subject>b</subject></message> is equivalent to <message><subject>b</subject><body>a</body></message> in XMPP (but not in XML). cheers, Remko
