-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nicolas Vérité wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Tomasz Sterna<to...@xiaoka.com> wrote: >>> Should we still stick to GPS only? Or be GPS-independant? >>> Should we add some fields to reflet the different other technologies? >>> Will new ones appear in the future? (highly probable?) >> Does it matter where you get your geographical coordinates from? > > IMHO no, and that's the point. > > In the XEP, we only use GPS. > > Do we want to be it: > - exhaustive (and add, GSM, wifi, etc.) > - technology-agnostic (and remove GPS) > ? To clarify: I guess you mean the XEP mentions GPS way to much. The data format itself does not rely on it AFAICT, right?
I guess this should be changed to what other XEPs do. Generally be technology-agnostic, but give some examples what possible data sources could be (making clear that those are only examples). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpojdAACgkQ0JXcdjR+9YSlvwCeIGYjzvKcyjOraLZcszcadBGz bfAAn0Q2FYvyftbvDY3KzulN/NK9fCPp =mQZU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
