On 28.04.2010 22:52, Joe Hildebrand wrote: > Any reactions to this? This is intended to be instead-of mine-ing, so I > would expect the anti-mine-ing folks to have some reaction one way or > another. > > Not sure if I'm to be considered anti-mine-ing, but my spontaneous reaction to this was "I have no real use for this, but sounds fine". While for Message Mineing it was "I have no use for this and WTF?".
One comment: "Servers MUST NOT enable the Carbons protocol for a client by default, since unmodified clients might be confused by the new protocol." might be a bit strong. Clients should probably have an appropriate disco feature and servers could then enable the protocol without being told to do so. I guess we still would not want to recommend that behavior to servers, but it doesn't hurt to make it possible. > > > On 4/23/10 11:01 AM, "XMPP Extensions Editor" <edi...@xmpp.org> wrote: > >> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP. >> >> Title: Message Carbons >> >> Abstract: In order to keep all IM clients for a user engaged in a >> conversation, outbound messages are carbon-copied to all interested >> resources. >> >> URL: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/carbons.html >> >> The XMPP Council will decide at its next meeting whether to accept this >> proposal as an official XEP. >> >
