On 6/6/10 2:22 PM, Guus der Kinderen wrote: > I would like to see the current XEPs > being fixed/improved in a way that doesn't require structural changes. I > think the suggestions made by both Brian and myself will make the > existing XEPs "work" as intended, without changing them in a structural > way. Low-hanging fruits? Can we simple pick one (or another alternative > to the same extend), incorporate that as a guideline in the existing > XEPs, and continue work on the sub-roster idea in a parallel effort?
Patches are always welcome, although I agree with others in this thread that work on distributed rosters would be more productive in the long term. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
