On 2010-06-29 23:48, Matthew Wild wrote: > On 30 June 2010 06:13, Paul Aurich <p...@darkrain42.org> wrote: >> While discussing XEP-0186 (Invisible Command) in >> pros...@conference.prosody.im, I noticed that the specification doesn't >> actually mention whether or not a server is supposed to generate any >> sort of presence probes. >> >> Waqas suggested that based on historical discussions, most people think >> the server shouldn't (I disagree, but anyway.) Regardless of which side >> of that people are on, I think the specification should, at the very >> least, bring up the topic. >> > > I wasn't around for the discussion (I was sleeping for once) but my > plan for a while has been to add a new attribute to signal this. > Setting probe='true' would ask the server to send probes (and thus > risk revealing your connected state) or probe='false' to not do this, > but understand you may not receive presence from your contacts.
+1 from me (if only because I suspect I'd be on the losing side of the ensuing debate without this option ;) ) ~Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
