On 2/25/11 11:12 PM, Waqas Hussain wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 2/12/11 4:26 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: >>> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP. >>> >>> Title: vCard4 Over XMPP >>> >>> Abstract: This document specifies an XMPP extension for use of the >>> vCard4 XML format in XMPP systems, with the intent of obsoleting the >>> vcard-temp format. >>> >>> URL: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/vcard4.html >>> >>> The XMPP Council will decide at its next meeting whether to accept >>> this proposal as an official XEP. >>> >> >> BTW, I've fixed some errors in the examples, so the latest version is >> now 0.0.4. Reload http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/vcard4.html as >> necessary. >> >> Peter > > Many more errors in the examples.
<snip/> Sure, those are easy to fix and I'll do that this week. > Now some comments. This was the first time I saw the vcard4 XML > schema. I was surprised at how it requires elements (even if they are > empty), and requires they be in a specific order. Just for amusement, > I proceeded to run the validator on the two largest examples within > the vcardxml draft. As I half expected, they failed. Please provide that feedback to the vcard4 authors or the list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav > The schema seemed long enough that I gave up on figuring out how > compatible this is with the existing vcard-temp. It's better to look at compatibility between vCard3 and vCard4. The vcard-temp stuff was never even quite in alignment with vCard3, as far as I know. > It looks like mapping > vCard4, vcard-temp, User Avatar, etc to a single backend is going to > be much more work than I had anticipated. I hope not. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
