On 4/28/11 9:52 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Thu Apr 28 14:49:35 2011, Evgeniy Khramtsov wrote: >> 28.04.2011 23:19, Matthew Wild wrote: >>> On 28 April 2011 14:13, Yann Leboulanger<aste...@lagaule.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Unfortunatly the goal of this XEP is not met: latest ejabberd and >>>> prosody >>>> don't implement that XEP. I've not checked other servers. >>>> >>>> >>> http://code.google.com/p/prosody-modules/wiki/mod_blocking >>> >>> It's waiting for client support, testing, and feedback before we can >>> include it in a release. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Matthew >>> >>> >> >> There is a patch available for ejabberd as well: >> https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-695 > > And just to join the vapourware announcements, the next release of > M-Link will be shipping with XEP-0191 as well. We've also implemented a > XEP-0050 suite of commands to control it, in order to side-step the > client/server/chicken/egg problem to some degree.
In fact it might have been better to just do ad-hoc commands, but the feedback at the time was that people wanted a simple, one-off control for "block this user". At least that's how I interpreted the feedback... Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
