On 10/19/2011 10:25 PM, Kevin Smith wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Sergey Dobrov <[email protected]> wrote: > The behaviour here is pretty much by design - the PEP defaults are > there for mutually shared information (e.g. extended presence) between > people with mutual presence subs. If you want a one-sided approach, > using manual subscriptions instead of the caps-based magic seems like > a better fit. > > /K > don't you think that such behavior is not consistent with simple presences? I mean, most of protocols that based on PEP are just extensions for simple presence mechanism and that's really unuseful that it's impossible to use them in a sheaf with subscriptions. A PEP service can't be implemented outside a jabber-server, so why we can't allow it to follow "probe" presences?
-- With best regards, Sergey Dobrov, XMPP Developer and JRuDevels.org founder.
