Could anyone tell me if that problem will be solved somewhere or it's destiny predetermined? I really blocked by this bug and have to make a choice to follow XSF's documents or drop them and build my own system.
On 09/27/2011 11:35 PM, Sergey Dobrov wrote: > The problem have it's begging in this ejabberd ticket: > https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-1473 > > I have small microblogging experimental project based on XEP-277, when > user wants to read some user, he sends subscribe presence. Another user > automatically sends "subscribed" but he doesn't obliged to ask presence > in the answer if he doesn't want to read the user's blog. But the > situation will be reversed: the first user will not receive > notifications but the second will. > > But the problem can't be solved because if contact have subscription > "from" then I can't see user's presence and hence it's capabilities too > and I can't generate events. But if subscription is "to", I see the > presence and caps and I can generate events BUT since the opponent has > not requested our subscription then, it's reasonable to say, that he's > not interested in receiving our events. So the situation just what isn't > needed and can't be solved with the current caps behavior. > -- With best regards, Sergey Dobrov, XMPP Developer and JRuDevels.org founder.
