-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

At its meeting on December 20, 2011, the XMPP Council agreed to issue
a "Call for Experience" regarding XEP-0047 (In-Band Bytestreams), in
preparation for perhaps advancing this specification from Draft to
Final in the XSF's standards process. To help the Council decide
whether this XEP is ready to advance to a status of Final, the Council
would like to gather the following information:

1. What software has implemented XEP-0047? Please note that the
protocol must be implemented in at least two separate codebases (and
preferably more).

2. Have developers experienced any problems with the protocol as defined
in XEP-0047? If so, please describe the problems and, if possible,
suggested solutions.

3. Is the text of XEP-0047 clear and unambiguous? Are more examples
needed? Is the conformance language (MAY/SHOULD/MUST) appropriate?
Have developers found the text confusing at all? Please describe any
suggestions you have for improving the text.

If you have any comments about advancing XEP-0047 from Draft to Final,
please provide them by the close of business on Friday, February 24,
2012. After the Call for Experience, this XEP might undergo revisions
to address feedback received, after which it will be presented to the
XMPP Council for voting to a status of Final.

You can review the specification here:

http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0047.html

Please send all feedback to the standards@xmpp.org discussion list.

Thanks!

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk8nH7UACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzSQwCffoBBmDnr+jJ3aOqrS6LF89AN
WpwAnA+1oPOYJ79N1NkK+1cd9dNu1HhL
=ld4P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to