-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2/15/12 12:48 PM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote: > > On Feb 15, 2012, at 8:26 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> I'd be willing to work on this, but I want to make sure that >> people think there's value in doing so. > > Personally, I not sure what I hate more, overly long documents or > specifications unnecessarily split over multiple documents. > > I don't consider XEP 45 or XEP 60 to be overly long.
Half the feedback I receive is (a) it's too hard to read a long spec. The other half is (b) it's too hard to read multiple specs. For XEP-0060, the feedback is heavily weighted toward (a). For XEP-0045, it's about evenly weighted. My conclusion is that we really need to split up XEP-0060, and that splitting XEP-0045 into user vs. admin use cases would be helpful. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk88EG8ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyaOwCfUBBv7bE94Om9ImDOoeIQmiTi 8a8AoLqKW6ul2QrXIuhMZJEWVILGjXVt =x30E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
