On Jun 30, 2012, at 1:58 PM, Mark Rejhon wrote: > Please, don't put a default call-block on all incoming deaf callers, some of > whom currently have no way of doing an interactive-mode conversation online > (only line-by-line, or doing video if they want to do sign language)
You've already agreed that there was not accessibility concern with IM, which is an interactive, real-time conversation mode (just with different atom of text). So can we please stop with the 'call-block on all incoming deaf callers' bit? That is, the spec should generally have requirements for what the spec is, an extension to XMPP IM, as opposed to being a part of a 'total conversation' system that includes A/V, RTT, and possibly other extensions. Then only in a section about interaction with other extensions should it be noted that for accessibility reasons, when offering one Real-Time Conversation mode it appropriate to offer other Real-Time conversation modes. -- Kurt
