Re: [Standards] XEP-0301 Real-Time Text: Unicode normalization, bidirectional, right-to-left text, etc. -- Comments needed

[Mark Rejhon]

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im>wrote:

> > I'll replace the word glyph with character.  The problem is I am trying
> > to be consistent with what "character" means.  RFC6365 has multiple
> > interpretations for the word "character", too.  Is it a code point?
> > Is it a displayable character?
> > Is it the 'char' data type (which can be 1,
> > 2 or 4 bytes each depending on platform)?
>

Again, the above were **rheoretical* *questions to prove the point why I
was avoiding the word "character". :-)



> > However, I've now removed the word "glyph" from the document.
>
> Good plan. :)
>

Problem solved.