This is certainly easier. If this extension gets rejected, I will
definitely try to use xep-0135 instead.
On 11/12/2012 04:14 AM, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
So I suggest to keep XEP-0135 as is and just add ability to retrieve
files via Jingle and to perform a search through ad-hoc commands.
On 11/09/2012 03:26 PM, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
On 11/09/2012 03:17 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On 8 November 2012 18:41, Sergey Dobrov <bin...@jrudevels.org> wrote:
On 11/09/2012 12:51 AM, Jefry Lagrange wrote:
I have tried many different ways of making the protocol. The first
time
around, I modified xep0135 to include search capabilities. Someone
told
me, I think it was Matthew, that xep0135 abuses service discovery by
using it too much. Also another thing that I noticed is that,
data-forms make the xep0135 stanzas become really big, as they waste
too
much space.
I actually don't understand hot is it possible to "abuse" service
discovery.
Maybe someone can explain?
I believe the thread Jefry references is this one:
http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2011-November/025456.html
ah, it seems that Jefrey was confused with the "overload" and "abuse"
terms. So I still think that it would be better to keep files
directories in the service discovery, just we need another way to do
search queries. I believe that the same thing Matthew actually said in
those thread.
Regards,
Matthew
