On May 22, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Spencer MacDonald <spencer.macdonald.ot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > Maybe there is a good reason for it, but in XEP-0280 Message Carbons the > forwarded stanza is nested in either a received or sent element with the > carbons xmlns. > > In XEP-0313 Message Archive Management the result element with the mam xmlns > is a sibling of the forwarded stanza. > > Should there be a standard for this in terms of wether the xmlns element > should be the parent or sibling of the forwarded stanza? This is just because MAM hasn't been updated to match yet. See http://matthewwild.co.uk/uploads/xep-0313.html -- Lance
