> File Sharing [4] is a previous extention that attempted to solve the same > problem as > this one, but unfortunetly it didn't generate much interest and it got > deprecated. > This extention aims be a modern replacement for XEP-0135.
Possibly, we need to say why we need a replacement for the 135 instead of raise it up? Paragraph 5: > it may be the case that the offering entity response might be too be for the server to handle Isn't it more correct to spell "too large" here? Example 8 is not a well formed XML. Nothing said about possible error conditions and about paths to the files. For example, must I use "/" as directories separator? Can I use "/" in file names? On 06/18/2013 06:08 PM, Sergey Dobrov wrote: > Very expected and interesting, will try to find a time to review in the > nearest future. > > Thanks. > > On 06/12/2013 03:47 AM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote: >> Version 0.1 of XEP-0329 (File Information Sharing) has been released. >> >> Abstract: This document specifies a simple extension to existing protocols >> that allows an entity to request information about files. >> >> Changelog: Initial published version approved by the XMPP Council. (psa) >> >> Diff: N/A >> >> URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0329.html >> >> > > -- With best regards, Sergey Dobrov, XMPP Developer and JRuDevels.org founder.
