The Purge API is something that I have been looking for, but the spec doesn't appear to have any way of finding out what messages have been purged from the archive, which means the local cache cannot be synced up with archive without fetching it all.
Spencer On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Matthew Wild <mwi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Valérian, > > On 10 October 2013 05:56, Valérian Saliou <valer...@valeriansaliou.name> > wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I'm re-escalating my request for XEP-0313 update, which purpose is to > bring > > a way to change the user's message archiving preferences (something very > > basic, so that we keep things simple and respect the philosophy of MAM > which > > is to remove the burden of previous message archiving XEPs). > > Sorry about the delay in processing your contribution. I've not had > much time to work on XEP stuff the past couple of months. > > > You can find the Web browser-viewable version of the updated > specification > > there: > > > https://demo.frenchtouch.pro/valerian.saliou/xmpp/extensions/xep-0313.html > > Also, my previous update request from August on this mailing list: > > http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2013-August/027873.html > > I had some questions about it from the other day which I can't recall > right now (and I'm going out). I was going to email you at the weekend > to see how your implementation of your changes was working out. > > Oh, I think one of my questions was that it might make more sense to > be able to delete by id (individual message), or even range of ids. > This is a bit awkward to implement, as it doesn't really make sense to > use RSM for deletion IMHO - but that's how access-by-id is > implemented. Thoughts? > > Also in my todo queue are updates related to message hints. After > deletion and hints are in, I think we're ready to push for draft! > > Regards, > Matthew >
