Hi, On 11 October 2013 01:50, Field Tian (fitian) <fit...@cisco.com> wrote: > If wrap json directly, we need to do xml escape, It is boring. or XML > Parser cannot parse the follow message(I put <x> into the value of status).
It might be boring, but any XML/XMPP library will be able to do this for you already. I really hope XMPP developers aren't manually XML escaping in their day-to-day work - I know I'm not :) > Why not use the traditional way? For example, to extend an element called > <cdata>, then whatever type of message can be put into. Please comment! It's definitely not "traditional" to use cdata in XMPP. I would worry about interoperability problems, and I don't think how you escape the data (through entities or cdata) is within the scope of this XEP anyway. Regards, Matthew
