-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/13 12:12 PM, Peter Waher wrote: > Hello Matt > > Sorry for the late response to your concern regarding the Dynamic > Forms proposal: > >> Regarding < http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/dynamic-forms.html >> >, it has not yet been accepted by Council because there appear >> to be strong similarities between this and XEP-0050: Ad-Hoc >> Commands, at least as currently documented. It is requested that >> the document first be updated to discuss differences between it >> and XEP-0050 before being considered for Experimental. > > I've now updated the Dynamic Forms XEP with the following > sections: > > * Section describing the differences between Ad-Hoc commands > (XEP-0050) and Dynamic Forms. * A section describing asynchronous > server updates to forms * An implementation note on how to merge > fields during asynchronous updates. > > I hope these answer your concerns regarding the Dynamic Forms XEP. > I've attached the files to this mail.
Updated in the inbox. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSgPv1AAoJEOoGpJErxa2plx8QAIyV5NHAQOEg5kU3jYG2207G xfVj/nYHvLQoXghGr0UCLGiKyqVZIXrawtt8d2XCAA/bV8vZqoMyHi7lHdp3GQRZ t0/minUb4gc1JFlX0/ucOZt1CfqvsYToaioGhinAOXXiAITr85jRA5oWRCSYdDWe qNpGnmyHD9ZKr3wbwWBabOYjyLhGkjIyI6+GzJ0nT7aZiBOM12TCaTwURNsJYwB/ NqnDJ9daArIF+ADlfwDp5oMsuL+TBcQdfN10rfSuWJGTpLm4Qk22uo5iMnRm4ETm eQ8iFJOUNrfDT0aQo5oGATT6mlee0Hbs4WXXjHmZdZ4Vop9fxOFHWGmBlc40BE52 V+0H+ViPttkJUC69zASq4/qVI81quOnPuDffOL4UuAHvkkFep/epufEuwMMixPJV RWXbUY+v6wEAC8nwPFYBis+pPUBuh/sai99X/FoPEPcloD6GIgc112DR8bvJxP+M nQ7J7HeDXDi8/3g+jyhZQBqiJ0au51xbsuyyj8XDsCmrqT1warU7yF8QF5Bx9Z7c kY0fiMoOLSL15t82qYMowK22lE7PabPlApGKkOcZ0uN3H1OvPH8wJvBNyLBLwakQ is5FGwrH0n4FR+oA27750SmhzneQBSMyick2NCd8OfxfyTqQbW6B3vmLeLi7GV7E shhZRgCyYnlRyRe5UJ83 =rI5Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
