-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi,
is there a XMPP client/library implementing [draft-miller] ?

When comparing [draft-miller] with XTLS, I think XTLS is simpler and
could be implemented using existing TLS libraries. TLS doesn't support
encryption of offline messages, but for offline messages OpenPGP
XEP-0027 could be used.

On 27.12.2013 20:33, Kim Alvefur wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2013-12-27 13:11, Fedor Brunner wrote:
>> I'm comparing the documents 
>> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-xtls.html 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-meyer-xmpp-e2e-encryption-02.html
>
>> 
> Maybe it/they should be using [XEP-0300], which I don't think were 
> around when those documents were written.  They have also kind of 
> stagnated and not been touched in some time.  Have you seen Matt
> Millers more recent attempt at e2e, [draft-miller] ?
> 
> [XEP-0300]: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0300.html 
> [draft-miller]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-miller-xmpp-e2e
> 
> 
> -- Regards, Kim "Zash" Alvefur
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=HLzH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to