Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:21:42 -0700 Kurt Zeilenga <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Matthew Wild <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 19 August 2014 17:21, Evgeny Khramtsov <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:30:18 +0100 > >> Matthew Wild <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You can implement as many finite state machines as you like. But > > this is not the XEP for that, this is just to turn them on/off. > > Let's keep it simple for once, folks :) > > I have to agree with Matthew. What this XEP offers is, by itself, > useful. Yes, it quite simplistic, leaving the choice of how to > optimize to the server. This is useful by itself. > > I personally rather not go down the rathole of 'exact finite state > machines'... or 'profiles'. But, hey, if that's what you want, you > can write a XEP just as well as anyone else. Seems like you don't get me. What we really need is to throttle presences when the client is in 'inactive' state. I don't think there are multiple ways in doing this. I, as an XMPP server developer, want to take well described FSM and implement it. Again, as an XMPP server developer I don't know what to do with client inactivity. It's pointless for me.
