Whilst I agree with you entirely (we could also use Travis to test patches are valid and publish / updated the website) I believe there are some potential legal issues that have come up previously.
I *think* the latest gitlab has public repositories but this does not allow for the fork + pull request model we are all used to with github. On 1 Sep 2014 18:37, "edhelas" <edhe...@movim.eu> wrote: > Yes I was just thinking of Github too. > The "pull request" feature is also really nice for : > - Fixing minor issues (typo, english mistake…) > - Proposing improvements for the XEP (changes that require major version > update). Then we can decide that for such request we talk about it during > the meeting. > > The current process (with the "inbox" and the validations) can also be > changed to a more modern one, linked with the bugtracker/feature system :) > > On lun., sept. 1, 2014 at 7:25 , Evgeny Khramtsov <xramt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Mon, 1 Sep 2014 19:08:22 +0200 Christian Schudt <christian.sch...@gmx.de> > wrote: > > Hi, I appreciate the idea to introduce an issue tracker for XEPs (like > Jira). > > It would be way much easier to move XEPs to github and use the > corresponding github's bug tracker. > >
