On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Stefan Strigler <stefan.strig...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everbody! > > Can someone please enlighten me why the section on archiving messages esp > the requirement to have > > <archived by='jul...@capulet.lit' id='28482-98726-73623' /> > > added to the message got removed at v0.3? I have a use case where this would > be very useful to know...
Sorry Stefan, looks like I didn't reply to this. In the 0.3 updates I couldn't come up with any use case involving the archived tag that wasn't ultimately broken in some way, so removing it seemed better than having people try to use it and not realise that what they were doing was broken. What's the use case you've got for it? /K
