On 14 Jan 2015, at 23:12, Matthew Wild <mwi...@gmail.com> wrote: > So are there any objections at all to removing <fin> and switching > back to the iq response signalling the end of results? If not, I'll > change it in the next revision and the problem that started this > thread will, I believe, be solved.
There’ve been no objections, so we’re intending to swap the message sentinel for the iq result again. /K
