I vote for not moving towards supporting :4. There isn't a compelling
reason to do it. So it is better to wait until (or if) there features
are supported in the next version or in some other XEP.
On 20/06/15 16:13, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
2015-06-20 21:59 GMT+02:00 Yann Leboulanger <aste...@lagaule.org
<mailto:aste...@lagaule.org>>:
That will also break compatibility with clients that supports only :3
namespace, but currently we don't work with clients that have :4
namespace implemented. implementing several version of a protocol is
quite complexe.
Thats basically the reason I'm asking. My client Conversations
currently only supports :3 and I'm not going to support both however I
would upgrade to :4 if gajim were to do so as well and thus making
Conversations compatible with Swift.
(Gajim, Conversations and Swift - to my knowledge - are the only
clients supporting Jingle FT)
cheers
Daniel
