> On 13 sep. 2015, at 15:50, Sam Whited <s...@samwhited.com> wrote: > > I was experimenting with OTR a bit today and was going to tweak this > section of the document, but I think I'm still siding with Daniel on > this one and am not going to make any change at the moment: Sending to > the full JID just doesn't work with OTR in practice. > > Does any client actually use instance tags to discard junk messages? > After a (very cursory) search over some popular clients I didn't see > any of them using instance tags. Would love to be told otherwise > though.
libotr does: https://bugs.otr.im/projects/libotr/repository/revisions/master/entry/src/message.c#L994 otr4j does: https://github.com/jitsi/otr4j/blob/bfd0b363a9a7865f68e46db19c095a8f34ace6be/src/main/java/net/java/otr4j/session/OtrAssembler.java#L96 AFAICT those two together cover a great number of clients. The only implementation of OTR I could find that does not support instance tags is pure-python-otr: https://github.com/python-otr/pure-python-otr/issues/28 Best regards, Thijs
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
