On 9/22/15 11:48 AM, Florian Schmaus wrote:
On 26.08.2015 17:59, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0352 (Client 
State Indication).

Abstract: This document defines a way for the client to indicate its 
active/inactive state.

URL: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0352.html

This Last Call begins today and shall end at the close of business on 
2015-09-07.

Please consider the following questions during this Last Call and send your 
feedback to the standards@xmpp.org discussion list:

1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to 
clarify an existing protocol?
Yes.

2. Does the specification solve the problem stated in the introduction and 
requirements?
Yes.

3. Do you plan to implement this specification in your code? If not, why not?
Yes.

4. Do you have any security concerns related to this specification?
No.

5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written?
I'd like to see https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/44 merged.

I'd love to see some list discussion about that suggestion. :-)

The proposed text is:

###

XMPP requires stanzas to be processed in order as per &rfc6120; 10.1. Especially "If the server's processing of a particular request could have an effect on its processing of subsequent data it might receive over that input stream..., it MUST suspend processing of subsequent data until it has processed the request.". As a result, all actions triggered by a CSI nonza sent to the server must happen before processing further requests from the same client to the server.

For example: A client sends a CSI active nonza, followed by an XMPP Ping request to the server. The server first changes the CSI state to active and flushes all eventually queued stanzsa. After the state has been restored to 'active' and all resulting stanzas have been put on the wire, the server sends the pong.

<!-- Client sends 'active' and a ping to the server -->

<active xmlns='urn:xmpp:csi:0'/>
<iq to='capulaet.lit' from='jul...@capulet.lit/balcony' id='ping1' type='get'>
  <ping xmlns='urn:xmpp:ping'/>
</iq>

<!-- Server restores stream state to active,
e.g. by flushing out queued stanzas to the client.
and responds to the ping with a pong -->

<iq to='jul...@capulet.lit/baclony' from='capulet.lit' id='ping1' type='result'/>

<!-- Stream state is now 'active' -->

###

Thoughts?

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/

Reply via email to