Hello Peter, On 11/05/2015 01:27 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > I haven't yet had time to look at your proposal in detail. However, > there is no _tls Protocol name in RFC 2782 or RFC 6335. It seems strange > for us to be the only ones using that non-standard value.
At least Microsoft Lync and *I think* SIP (though I can't find a reference right now) use 'tls' for the Protocol value as well. Also RFC 2782 does not define values for it, leaving it to be any 'defined name'. This was discussed on the github pull request, and Dave Cridland wrote, in part: > I wasn't sure, either, about the use of _tls; so I asked Arnt > Gulbrandsen (author of RFC 2782) - his opinion was that using _tls, > and intermixing the _tcp proto records, was perfectly acceptable. His > concerns were actually that he felt that ALPN should be made mandatory. Thanks, Travis
